THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
Spacer GifHOME > Business > Changes made to the Community Attitudes to Privacy 2007 report Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif Bullet Codes
Spacer Gif Bullet Guidelines
Spacer Gif Bullet Small Business
Spacer Gif Bullet Opting-in to Privacy Act coverage
Spacer Gif Bullet Anti-Money Laundering
Spacer Gif Bullet Credit Reporting
Spacer Gif Bullet Tax File Numbers
Spacer Gif Bullet Information Sheets
Spacer Gif Bullet 10 Steps Guides
Spacer Gif Bullet Research
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Connections Network
Spacer Gif Bullet Consultations
Spacer Gif SPECIFIC PRIVACY
INFORMATION FOR:
Spacer Gif > Individuals
Spacer Gif > Business
Spacer Gif > Health
Spacer Gif > Government
Horizontal Rule
Spacer Gif > Federal Privacy Law
Spacer Gif > About the Office
Spacer Gif > Frequently Asked Questions
Spacer Gif > IT and Internet Issues
Spacer Gif > Media and Speeches
Spacer Gif > Publications
Spacer Gif > Privacy Links
Spacer Gif > International
Spacer Gif > Contact us

Spacer Gif

Changes made to the Community Attitudes to Privacy 2007 report

View printable version of this page

Changes made to the Community Attitudes to Privacy 2007 report

A revised report of the Community Attitudes to Privacy study now appears on this website, replacing the earlier version of the report that had appeared here prior to 26 September 2007. Details of the amendments made in the revised report are as follows:

Some respondents to the survey provided more than one answer to the questions associated with the following four sections of the report:

  • "Attitudes towards health professionals sharing patient information" (section 10.2, page 47)
  • "Employer activities and employee privacy" (section 11.1.1, page 53)
  • "Attitudes towards employers using surveillance equipment to monitor the workplace" (section 11.3, page 57) and
  • "Attitudes towards employers monitoring telephone conversations" (section 11.4, page 58).

The charts and tables in these four sections therefore showed results indicating that slightly more than 100% of people had responded to the questions. To remove any potential bias in these results due to multiple responses, the data for these questions has been recalculated (i.e. any respondent who provided more than one response to a question has been removed from the analysis for each question) and the figures in the charts/tables and accompanying text have been amended accordingly. It is important to note the new base (n) in each of the charts/tables is now slightly different to all respondents (1503), but only slightly. The amended results do not differ significantly from the results obtained when multiple respondents were included in the analysis, and the trends in the amended data (both downward and/or upward) for each question also remain the same.

The section, "Attitudes towards unsolicited marketing material" (section 7.5, page 29) also allowed respondents to give multiple responses but, unlike with the above sections, the data has not been recalculated. The question this section was based on was asked in previous studies and, on those occasions, multiple responses were allowed. Clarification has been provided in the report in this regard.

The results for the male and female respondents disagreeing with the survey question for the section, "Attitudes towards a unique identifier for all Australian Government departments" (section 9.1, page 39, see chart 16), has also been amended. The proportion of males and females disagreeing with the question had been incorrectly reported, with the amended results showing that a greater number of males and females disagree with the question. This change does not affect any of the other results shown in the chart (i.e. the Total and Household Income results).



Spacer Gif> Privacy Policy Spacer Gif> Copyright Spacer Gif> Site map Spacer Gif> Join Email List Spacer Gif> Glossary Spacer Gif> Calendar Spacer Gif> Newsletter