THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
Spacer GifHOME > Federal Privacy Law > 2002 - Complaints Case Notes 1 Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act Regulations
Spacer Gif Bullet Public Interest Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Guidelines
Spacer Gif Bullet Complaint Case Notes & Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Audits
Spacer Gif Bullet Information Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet National Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Codes and Opt-in Registers
Spacer Gif Bullet Credit Reporting
Spacer Gif Bullet Health
Spacer Gif Bullet Telecommunications
Spacer Gif Bullet Tax File Numbers
Spacer Gif Bullet Spent Convictions
Spacer Gif Bullet Data-matching
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Advisory Committee
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Review 2005
Spacer Gif Bullet ALRC Privacy Inquiry 2006 - 08
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Law History
Spacer Gif SPECIFIC PRIVACY
INFORMATION FOR:
Spacer Gif > Individuals
Spacer Gif > Business
Spacer Gif > Health
Spacer Gif > Government
Horizontal Rule
Spacer Gif > Federal Privacy Law
Spacer Gif > About the Office
Spacer Gif > Frequently Asked Questions
Spacer Gif > IT and Internet Issues
Spacer Gif > Media and Speeches
Spacer Gif > Publications
Spacer Gif > Privacy Links
Spacer Gif > International
Spacer Gif > Contact us

Spacer Gif

2002 - Complaints Case Notes 1

View printable version of this page

Case Citation: A v Insurer [2002] PrivCmrA 1

Subject Heading: Adequacy of privacy statement in relation to the collection of personal information

Law: National Privacy Principle 1.3

Facts

The complainant alleged that the privacy statement on the insurer's travel insurance claim form was deficient for the following reasons:

  • unless she provided her personal information, her claim would not be processed;
  • the form stated that personal information about the complainant would be disclosed to "other consultants" that were not otherwise specified; and
  • the statement needed clearer information about the parties to whom her personal information would be disclosed.

Issues

(1) National Privacy Principle 1.3 requires that, at or before the time an organisation collects personal information about an individual directly from the individual, the organisation must take reasonable steps to ensure that the individual is aware of a number of specified matters. It appeared that the privacy statement was only brought to the individual?s attention when they made a claim, rather than when they entered into the insurance contract and provided their personal information to the insurer. The office took the view that the statement should be provided to the individual at the time the contract of insurance is entered into, so that they can make an informed decision about whether they wish to enter into the contract.

(2) The statement reads, in part: 'We may also disclose personal information including sensitive information about you such as health information to medical practitioners, other health professionals, reinsurers, legal representatives and other consultants'. National Privacy Principle 1.3(d) requires that the individual be made aware of 'the organisations (or the types of organisations) to which the organisation usually discloses information of that kind?'. It is questionable whether 'consultants' adequately identifies the type of organisation to which personal information may be disclosed. The Office recommended that the insurer provide a more specific description.

(3) The privacy policy also states that "By signing the claim form, you consent to us and those organisations [emp added] and other professionals collecting and disclosing sensitive information about you?". On reading the above phrase it appears that the personal information provided to the insurer by the claimant could be passed on by the insurer to the types of organisations mentioned who could in turn pass on the information without restriction. It is not stated to whom those other organisations would be disclosing the information.

Outcome

As a result of the investigation, the insurer agreed to implement the following changes in relation to each of the issues raised.

Issue 1. The insurance product in question was bundled together with a number of credit card products so that the individual dealt directly only with the credit card providers; the only time the individual dealt directly with the insurer was if he or she made a claim. The insurer agreed to contact the card providers to arrange for the inclusion of new terms and conditions in the contract so that, before they enter into the contract, potential claimants would be told what would happen with their personal information and why the insurer needed to collect it.

Issue 2. The privacy policy has been reworded to make it clearer to whom personal information is passed in relation to each insurance product. The term 'other consultants' remains but specific lists are located on the insurer's website and can be obtained from it on request, to specifically define who 'other consultants' and professionals are for each of its insurance products.

Issue 3. The travel claim form now makes clearer the persons to whom the insurer discloses personal information. The relevant section now reads, "By signing this Claim Form, You consent to those organisations and other professionals collecting, and Us disclosing sensitive information about You for this purpose".

The investigation was closed under s.41(2)(a) of the Privacy Act, on the grounds that the insurer had adequately dealt with the matter.

OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
DECEMBER 2002



    Spacer Gif> Privacy Policy Spacer Gif> Copyright Spacer Gif> Site map Spacer Gif> Join Email List Spacer Gif> Glossary Spacer Gif> Calendar Spacer Gif> Newsletter