THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
Spacer GifHOME > Federal Privacy Law > 2007 - Complaint Case Note 19 Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Act Regulations
Spacer Gif Bullet Public Interest Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Guidelines
Spacer Gif Bullet Complaint Case Notes & Determinations
Spacer Gif Bullet Audits
Spacer Gif Bullet Information Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet National Privacy Principles
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Codes and Opt-in Registers
Spacer Gif Bullet Credit Reporting
Spacer Gif Bullet Health
Spacer Gif Bullet Telecommunications
Spacer Gif Bullet Tax File Numbers
Spacer Gif Bullet Spent Convictions
Spacer Gif Bullet Data-matching
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Advisory Committee
Spacer Gif Bullet Private Sector Review 2005
Spacer Gif Bullet ALRC Privacy Inquiry 2006 - 08
Spacer Gif Bullet Privacy Law History
Spacer Gif SPECIFIC PRIVACY
INFORMATION FOR:
Spacer Gif > Individuals
Spacer Gif > Business
Spacer Gif > Health
Spacer Gif > Government
Horizontal Rule
Spacer Gif > Federal Privacy Law
Spacer Gif > About the Office
Spacer Gif > Frequently Asked Questions
Spacer Gif > IT and Internet Issues
Spacer Gif > Media and Speeches
Spacer Gif > Publications
Spacer Gif > Privacy Links
Spacer Gif > International
Spacer Gif > Contact us

Spacer Gif

2007 - Complaint Case Note 19

View printable version of this page

Case Citation: 

Q v Australian Government Agency [2007] PrivCmrA 19

Subject Heading:

Failure to keep personal information accurate and secure

Law:

Information Privacy Principles 4 and 8 in Part III Division 2 of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Facts:

The complainant had dealings with a government agency for a number of years, which had involved the complainant receiving mail through a Post Office Box (PO Box).  The complainant then received two letters delivered to their home address rather than the PO Box.

The complainant raised this matter with the agency, but was informed that no explanation could be given as the agency had no file record of the complainant's address being changed from the PO Box to the residential address.

The complainant wrote to the Privacy Commissioner unsatisfied with the response from the agency.

Issues:

Information Privacy Principle 4(a) obliges an Agency to protect the personal information it holds with such safeguards as are reasonable in the circumstances.

Information Privacy Principle 8 provides that a record-keeper who has possession or control of a record that contains personal information shall not use that information without taking such steps (if any) as are, in the circumstances, reasonable to ensure that ... the information is accurate, up to date and complete.

Outcome:

The Privacy Commissioner investigated the matter under section 40(1) of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).

The government agency informed the Commissioner that it had an arrangement with two other government agencies to share data regarding mutual clients.  As a result of a clerical error while handling some of this shared information, the complainant's residential address was added to their electronic database record in place of the PO Box address.

Using the powers of conciliation granted under section 27(1)(a) of the Privacy Act, the Commissioner presented the government agency with a solution proposed by the complainant.  The government agency continued negotiations for a conciliatory settlement with the complainant.

The complainant was satisfied with the assistance the Commissioner had provided and decided to continue to deal with the matter with the government agency directly.

Satisfied that the matter was being adequately dealt with, the Commissioner closed the matter under section 41(2)(a) of the Privacy Act.

OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER

June 2007



Spacer Gif> Privacy Policy Spacer Gif> Copyright Spacer Gif> Site map Spacer Gif> Join Email List Spacer Gif> Glossary Spacer Gif> Calendar Spacer Gif> Newsletter